Monday, May 20, 2019

How are decisions in real world organizations actually made? Essay

There are unhomogeneous decision make models in the real world. These decisions are made in different situations which seat be stressful or normal business situations. Those who take decisions in an organization are individuals. There are various factors in any organization or group of people that have impact on their development and growths. One of such factors is conflict. This paper discusses various aspects of conflict management and negotiation at workplace. fighting can be dues to various factors.These factors can be individual factors like attitude, light, cultural and gender differences and it can be organizational factors like inappropriate allocation of resources, management styles, leadership and type of communication. Figure 2 Decision making processes Bounded Rationality There are various reasons to bounded rationality. These are as follows common Biases and Errors, anchoring Bias, overconfidence bias, confirmation bias, availability bias, representative bias, esca lation of commitment error, randomness error and hindsight bias. scholarship Intuition can be defined as Unconscious decision making process based on experience of the same job or industry. Individual Differences Individual differences contribute to individual decision making styles. Organization Constraints There are various kinds of organizational constraints which are influenced by perception of an individual or group. These are as follows Performance Evaluation Reward Systems System-imposed Time Constraints Historical Precedents Formal Regulation ethnical Differences This plays very important roles in multi-location or multinational environment.Every place on the earth has some(a) kind of variety and difference attached to it. These differences grow stronger with the distances. These differences can be in appearance, social coordinate or behavior of an individual. This also contributes to decision making process. How can our perceptions shape ethical or moral decisions? Percep tions shape our ethical and moral decisions. An individual who perceives that dealing unfair with someone is unethical and not right thing to do will take decision in such a way that it benefits its employee.On the other hand a person with self centric approach will think well-nigh himself first and will justify it by saying himself a professional. Social capital in an sparing sector is determined by the quality and frequency of the relationships between its members, which, some evidence indicates, can vary from region to region according to the socio-cultural evolution of each location. The quality of the relationships, in turn, is affected by the perception of the individuals about their capacity to establish good working relationships with others and perform adequately.ReferenceHolloway, R. E. (1977) Perceptions of an innovation Syracuse University throw up Advance. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Syracuse University. Hutcheson, P. , Pearson, A. W. and Ball, D. F. (1996) Source s of technical innovation in the network of companies providing chemical process plant and equipment. explore Policy 25, No. 1, 25-41. Julie Gatlin, Allen Wysocki, and Karl Kepner2, Understanding Conflict in the Workplace1 retrieved on 21 June 2007 from http//edis. ifas. ufl. edu/HR024 Robbins, Stephen P, 2005 Organizational Behavior, Eleventh Edition, Prentice-Hall

Sunday, May 19, 2019

Marketing is the delivery of standard of living Essay

This concept was originated by Paul Mazur. harmonise to him, market is the rescue of standard of living. Prof. McNair made an important amendment in the definition. According to him, Marketing if the creation and delivery of standard of living to the society. It is consumer oriented concept. Producer tries to know the guests need and plan his point of intersectionion accordingly. Aggressive trade technique is uptaked to bring forward the society to purchase new product. The availability of goods also increased. It is because of this concept that at once we are able to consume more quality product.Marketing is one of the terms in academia that does not have one commonly agreed upon definition. Even after a better patch of a century the debate continues. In a nutshell it consists of the social and managerial processes by which products (goods or services) and cherish are exchanged in order to fulfill the needs and wants of individuals or groups. Although many people see to think that merchandise and advertising are synonymous, they are not. Advertising is simply one of the many processes that together constitute marketing, as suggested by the American Marketing Association, is an organizational bidction and a set of processes for creating, communicating and delivering tax to customers and for managing customer relationships in ways that benefit the organization and its stakeholders.An an new(prenominal)(prenominal) definition, perhaps simpler and more universal, is this Marketing is the ongoing process of moving people closer to making a decision to purchase, use, followor conform to nearlyone elses products, services or values. Simply, if it doesnt facilitate a sale therefore its not marketing. Philip Kotler in his earlier books defines as Marketing is human activity directed at satisfying needs and wants by exchange processes. Add to Kotlers and Norris definitions, a response from the Chartered wreak of Marketing (CIM). The associations de finition claims marketing to be the management process of anticipating, identifying and satisfying customer requirements profitably.Thus, operative marketing involves the processes of market research, new product development, product life cycle management, pricing, duct management as well as promotion. Marketing-taking actionsto define, create, grow, develop, maintain, defend and own markets. An approach to business that seeks to identify, foresee and satisfy customers needs. The role of marketing is to facilitate exchanges. Its essence is to create greater contentment and satisfaction by recognizing the preference structures of both parties and crafting the basis for exchanges. Marketings value to society is that it creates more efficient and trenchant interaction between and among individuals and organizations.Marketing is endemic to society. Whenever there is an exchange or an attempted exchange of something of value for something else of value, the marketing process is at wor k. The process of marketing pre-dates written history, where individuals bartered goods and services in exchange for other goods and services to produce a more satisfying life than one they could produce for themselves.Five conditions must(prenominal) be met for an exchange to take place1.There is at least deuce parties.2. Each party has something that readiness be of value to the other party.3. Each party is capable of communication and delivery.4. Each party is ease to accept or reject the offer.5. Each party believes it is appropriate or desirable to deal with the other party.These five conditions are inherent in ancient markets, where farmers and craftsmen brought their produce and wares to a central market. So overly it applies to todays flea markets, garage sales and ebay transactions. It also applies to the sophisticated supply chains necessary to beginning a Wal-Mart store or build a missile system for the military.Marketing is pervasive in all human endeavors. Most hu man interaction requires an understanding of the other partys sentiment in order to have a productive relationship. Therefore the principles of marketing are applied in both for-profit and not-for-profit settings, including the marketing of places, causes, events, organizations, and persons. For simplicity ofpresentation in this book, we will refer to the parties in the exchanges as corrupters and sellers to set up a commercial transaction between a producer and a customer, even though some exchanges are not commercial and both parties are technically buyers and sellers.Marketing is the creation of improvement? addressMarketing seeks to satisfy the needs of people (customers or the market) (creating a sense of usefulness or utility) through the exchange process. Marketing refers to channeling the gap between service and product providers to service and product seekers also know as a way of satisfying needs. The marketing Mix or the 4 Ps areproductplacepromotionpriceThe concept of 4ps is replaced by the concept of 7 ps they are productpriceplacepromotionpeoplepositioning promotionThese are employed to satisfy a target market or target demographic (the puddle of potential customers). ExampleProduct Procter and encounter introduces new toothpaste designed to taste good and fight cavities. logo and packaging designed in bright colors to appeal to kids of elementary school age to encourage more tooth brushing. Price $2.00, and discounted by means of couponsPromotion television and radio commercials, magazine and newspaper ads, and a website these use bright colors and happy music, perhaps an animated cartoon character for a fun and family-friendly attitude Place (ordistribution) Supermarkets, drugstores, discount stores such as Wal-MartTarget demographicMothers with kids who make toothpaste buying decisions for the family (advertising could be shown on childrens programming, prompting kids to ask parents to buy the toothpaste)Creating utilityThe American Her itage Dictionary defines utility as the quality or condition of being useful. Utility is further defined as any quality and/or status that provide a product with the capability to satisfy the consumers wants and needs. Marketing is responsible for creating most of a products inherent utility. There are intravenous feeding basic types of utilityForm utility production of the good or service, driven by the marketing function. For example, Procter and Gamble turns raw ingredients and chemicals into toothpaste. Place utility making the product available where customers will buy the product. Procter and Gamble secures shelf space for the toothpaste at a wide variety of retailers including supermarkets and drugstores. Time utility making the product available when customers want to buy the product. The U.S. drugstore chain Walgreens has many locations open 24 hours a day, and since the 1990s has placed most of their newer stores at major intersections. Possession utility once you have pu rchased the product, you have rights to use the product as intended, or (in theory) for any use you would like.A fifth type of utility is a great deal defined along with the above four types Image utility the satisfaction acquired from the emotional or mental meaning attached to products. Some people pay more for toothpaste perceived to be more efficacious at fighting cavities and whitening teeth. Process creates utility The exchange process is the process by which two or more parties give something of value to each other to satisfy the perceived needs. The marketer (a keep company like Procter and Gamble) offers goods and services desired by the market (the pool of potential customers). In return, the market (the customer) gives patronage something of value to the marketer, generally bullion. Both ends receive something of value in the exchange process. The marketer makes money and thecustomer receives goods, services, or ideas that satisfy their needs. The exchange process i s the origin of marketing. The process creates utility.For an exchange to occurBoth parties must have something of value to exchange.Both parties need to be able to communicate. Procter and Gamble (P&G), for example, must have money to purchase advertising space.Both parties must be able to exchange. The toothpaste, in some cases, must be approved by the FDA in order for it to be sold. The customer must be able to buy the product with his or her money, and have access to a retail store where the product is sold to be able to buy it. Both parties must want to exchange.At least two parties are demand for an exchange to occur.

Body Image

Todays media has become a large benefactor for women in societys poor trunk acceptance. Although advertising aims to convince us to buy things, ads seldom gift multitude that look like us. The average egg-producing(prenominal) fashion model wears in-between a coat deuce or four, while the average Ameri endure woman wears a size 12 or 14. Although todays media portrays female models as alluring, and desirable by all men it is also producing a picture that is further outside from reality and is fiercely unreal, and unattainable (452).Images of models in ads ar often touched up, in order to overwhelm nipper flaws or make the models appear even skinnier than they really are. These false body image ads, demo bodies that are not ell or representative of the general female population, need far-reaching effects. It might seem that it should be recognizable when an ad shows something not real scarcely we still tend to trust what is seen in the media and through and through tha t, body image wad be easily confused. The constant barrage of unrealistically skinny women can snow flurry up feelings of inadequacy, anxiety and depression.This is what leads to the development of eat disorders like anorexia and bulimia, in todays young adult population. point before young woman were influenced by the images of media they were being influenced tit Americas top selling manufactured skirt since 1 959, Barbie. The average American girl between the ages of three to 1 1 , grows up surrounded by the Barbie body image. Not every child is influenced by the toys they play with but young children can be easily influenced, especially by their toys.Toys are designed to allow children to practice for roles they will dissipate on as adults thats why housekeeping toys, doctor kits, toy pots and pans, and baby dolls were manufactured. Through play, children learn to the highest degree the foundation and their place in it. What do Barbies teach children about the world? T hey teach children that is it desirable to be super thin, and to strive for an unrealistic body image. Research done by the AND show that 95% of those who have eating disorders are between the ages of 12 and 25.The AND also shows, that the mortality rate associated with anorexia nervous is 12 propagation high than the death rate associated with all causes of death for females 15-24 years old. Remember these young women likely compete with Barbie dolls, threefold Barbies around these young ages. Not only can the media stir up feelings of inadequacy, anxiety, and depression but so can an unrealistically proportioned doll, that is portraying to adolescence what women should be.Body ImageTodays media has become a huge benefactor for women in societys poor body acceptance. Although advertising aims to convince us to buy things, ads seldom portray people that look like us. The average female fashion model wears in-between a size two or four, while the average American woman wears a s ize 12 or 14. Although todays media portrays female models as alluring, and desirable by all men it is also producing a picture that is far removed from reality and is fiercely unreal, and unattainable (452).Images of models in ads are often touched up, in order to disguise minor flaws or make the models appear even skinnier than they really are. These false body image ads, showing bodies that are not ell or representative of the general female population, have far-reaching effects. It might seem that it should be recognizable when an ad shows something not real but we still tend to trust what is seen in the media and through that, body image can be easily confused. The constant barrage of unrealistically skinny women can stir up feelings of inadequacy, anxiety and depression.This is what leads to the development of eating disorders like anorexia and bulimia, in todays young adult population. Even before young woman were influenced by the images of media they were being influenced t it Americas top selling manufactured doll since 1 959, Barbie. The average American girl between the ages of three to 1 1 , grows up surrounded by the Barbie body image. Not every child is influenced by the toys they play with but young children can be easily influenced, especially by their toys.Toys are designed to allow children to practice for roles they will take on as adults thats why housekeeping toys, doctor kits, toy pots and pans, and baby dolls were manufactured. Through play, children learn about the world and their place in it. What do Barbies teach children about the world? They teach children that is it desirable to be extremely thin, and to strive for an unrealistic body image. Research done by the AND show that 95% of those who have eating disorders are between the ages of 12 and 25.The AND also shows, that the mortality rate associated with anorexia nervous is 12 times higher than the death rate associated with all causes of death for females 15-24 years old. Rememb er these young women likely played with Barbie dolls, multiple Barbies around these young ages. Not only can the media stir up feelings of inadequacy, anxiety, and depression but so can an unrealistically proportioned doll, that is portraying to adolescence what women should be.

Saturday, May 18, 2019

Nepotism Essay

Workers who be the to the highest degree innovative or productive or those who possess visionary leadership are necessarily propelled to the top of the maneuvering ladder. This is the image many people have of the workplace. In reality, the practice session of favoring and promoting relatives, more unremarkably turn inn as nepotism (Employee Issues), is widely practiced in companies large and small across the country. The dangers of nepotism to your accompany shouldnt be overlooked. It is not only wise to promote antinepotism policies but also to regularly monitor ones round to check out that such relationships have not developed. Some problems nepotism tin sess cause is a disruption of the work day, unfair treatment between employees and unfair job opportunities, and favoritism.One of the chief complaints in a company that operates through nepotism is the obvious lack of fairness. Perceived favoritism of a relative can cause dissatisfaction amongst the workers and it can lower morale in the workplace. Employees may have less incentive to perform their jobs diligently and proficiently if they musical note that the path to promotion is undermined by nepotism. Although, a company employing such tactics may regard its more valuable employees seeking new employment where their talent is better recognized. At a minimum, workers will likely complain and become bitter and less productive in the face of blatant nepotism. lamella Corkindale, a writer for Harvard occupancy Online, described a typical workplace scenario involving nepotism at a composition for which she used to work. A young, inexperienced colleague was hired in her department, and she actually spent several months component him adjust to his role at the paper. Soon after, the young colleague was promoted to become her boss. Only then did she pick up that he was actually an editors nephew. Given the nephews effortless and unwarranted promotion, Corkindale ended up leaving the paper (Corkin dale).Another disruption to workflow in a business is the worry and chance of lawsuits. Even though very few laws regulate nepotism at either the evoke or national level. In fact, some states have no laws prohibiting the practice. Nevertheless, the consequences of nepotism may increase your risk of being sued for discrimination or ill work environment. For instance, personalrelationships and fraternization between coworkers often lead to over the top breakups and aflame trauma at the office. One of the parties may accuse the other of sexual harassment or of creating a hostile work environment, especially if one of the parties is a supervisor.It can also have a no-account effect on the management position. Subordinates will likely take a dim view of an employers ethical motive and judgment when they hire their friends for job openings. Cronyism, a partiality towards hiring close supporters, may suggest that the employer is weak, unsafe and requires a network of allies to suppo rt their decisions. In addition to inspiring little confidence in their power and authority, a boss who embraces nepotism is deemed unlikely to make fair assessments of others accomplishments, especially when it comes to promotional opportunities. Nor will workers cipher such an employer can be relied upon to dispense appropriate discipline if the guilty party happens to be a friend. There are, of course, exceptions to this train of thought. Hiring someone you know means that you are already attuned to their strengths and weaknesses and see comfortable that they know how you think. If the friendship is longstanding and secure, they have a vested interest in not letting you down and in maintaining the professionalism to keep both halves of your lives appropriately separate.The employee that is favour is also at risk of judgment. Even if the friend of the employer is rattling the outdo qualified in the candidate pool, they enter the workplace equation under an immediate befog of suspicion. Everything they do could be scrutinized for signs of incompetence. Every decision they make could be challenged to test their allegiance. Every friendship they endeavor to make could be interpreted as just a ploy to learn secrets and report top to the boss. Although the respect of their coworkers may eventually be won if the worker proves himself worthy, the stress of being watched, judged and distrusted in the slowdown can take an emotional and physical toll.One should not forget about a very important aspect of any work place. This aspect is, of course, the workers morale. Having good or defective morale can easily make or break a company. Nepotism can foster hostile feelings ofinequality that employees may react to in one of two ways. The first is to repeatedly undermine the favored workers capabilities and attempt to sabotage their projects. These efforts to get them fired, however, can result in costly mistakes and bolshie of time which can then potentially imp act customer relations. The second reaction is an attitude of defeat. If employees collide with that promotions and perks will always go friends of the boss, they will likely feel less inclined to do their best work to distinguish themselves. Resentment and indifference can lead to reduced productivity as wellhead as employee turnover if workers decide that nothing will ever get better.According to Dr. Stephen Asma, who is in near support of nepotism, favoritism(nepotism) is used more as a scapegoat. He states that fairness is redirected to words like gross profit and generosity, as opposed to favoritism which is related to words like corruption and prejudice. He says having these preconceived notions mechanically labels the situation as good or bad, people just automatically assume that its a bad thing that the new employee is related to or has a close relationship with the boss (Asma). disco biscuit Bellow states in his book In Praise of Nepotism that Americans censure nepoti sm on the one hand and practice it as much as they can on the other. Theres much to be state for good nepotism, which is fortunate, because were living in a nepotistic Golden Age (Bellow). In his book he talks heavily about politicians and how a lot of them were born into their roles. Along with being pretty smart politicians, they have the extra help coming from their status their parents had built for them, but he doesnt state that this is a bad thing. Bellow says that having that image put on them, gives them the attention they need to get their ideas across, which has been a great gateway to finding a lot of our most famous politicians in history (Bellow).When it comes to something as touchy as favoritism or nepotism in the workplace, there are definitely many opinions on the topic. Each side can give a relatively solid argument but when it comes to most people, especially employees of businesses, they are wishinging fair treatment between everyone. In my own opinion, I feel n epotism has no place in the workplace,every employee should have the same treatment and opportunities available to them. In conclusion, this analyse has went over how nepotism affects the workplace in most every aspect, the unfair treatment between employees and unfair opportunities it can create, and what favoritism does. A person chooses a career because they really enjoy that field of work and they want to be successful in it, but when an obstacle enters the picture and stunts your ability to move forward in your career it can have dire consequences. Lastly, looking at all the evidence and facts, I feel nepotism should be a very closely watched incident in every business as to ensure fair treatment between all of the employees.Works CitedAsma, Stephen. The Upside of Nepotism. Psychology Today. 12 January, 2013. Web. 3 December, 2013. Bellow, Adam. The Atlantic. Editorial. Atlantic 1 July 2013 The Atlantic. The Atlantic, 1 July 2003. Web. 03 December, 2013. Cammeron, Brenna. Six Tales of Top-level Workplace Nepotism. BBC.com. 21 August 2013. Web. 12 November 2013. . Corkindale, Gill. Nepotism Wrong for the Workplace? Harvard Business Review. Harvard, 17 October 2007. Web. 3 December 2013. Edwards, Timothy. Issue Whether Nepotism Constitutes a Conflict of Interest Under the Code of moral philosophy? Advisory Opinion 95-11-1133. King County, Washington Department of Information & Administrative Services, 18 June 1998. Web. 12 November 2013 http//www.metrokc.gov/ethics/1133.html Goff, Keli. In Defense of Nepotism and Classism at the New York Times. The Huffington Post. 21 August 2013. Web. 12 November 2013. . Green, Michael Z. Do Anti-Nepotism Policies Avoid or Create Unfair Treatment?, 1998. 12 November 2013 http//www.nlfpc.com/publications/ collect/art27.html Huerta, Timothy. General Manager, Associated Students, Inc. California State University, Los Angeles. 4 April 2000. record Interview on the topic of Anti-Nepotism. 12 November 2013 Nepotism Employee Issues. Web. 12 November 2013.Risser, Rita. What are Legal Risks of Anti-Nepotism Policies?, Fair Measures. Santa Cruz, 1997. Web. 12 November 2013. http//www.fairmeasures.com/asklawyer/archive/summer97/ask120.html Shawe. MD Court of Special Appeals to Determine Lawfulness of EmployersAnti-Nepotism Policy, Network Publication Inc. 2.97. Baltimore, MD. 1997. Web. 12 November 2013 http//www.shawe.com/nepotism.html

Link Manufacturing Process and Product Life Cycles

133 Link manufacturing attend and harvest-tide breeding calendar method of birth controls direction on the crop gives a naked as a jaybird dimension to strategy Robert H. hay and Steven C. Wheelw counterbalance Although the proceeds look bi rung concept whitethorn rush value for managers, its emphasis on merchandise nates gear up it inadequate for strategic planners. These authors point out that using a parade aliveness round shadow help a partnership favor among its various manufacturing and market options. Using the concept of a intersection point- make for matrix, they picture how a connections invest contemplates its weaknesses and strengths, and they discuss the implications for corporate strategy.Mr. Hayes is professor of business ecesis at the Harvard wrinkle School. He is currently serving as faculty chairman of and teaching at Harvards Senior Managers course in Vevcy, Switzerland. One of his previous words in HBR is How Should You Organize Manu facturing? (coauthor, Roger W. Schmenner, JanuaryFchruary 1978). Mr. Wheelwright is associate professor of business administration at the Harvard Business School. He is currently teaching in the MBA program and is faculty chairman of Harvards executive program on Manufacturing in Corporate Strategy.One of his previous HBR articles is Corporate Forecasting Promise and Reality, coauthor, Darral G. Clarke, nary(prenominal)emberDecember 1976). The system of the growth cyeles of living organisms has always fascinated thoughtful observers and has invited a variety of attempts to apply the same principlesof a predictable sequence of rapid growth followed by maturation, dec outline, and death-to companies and selected industries. One untold(prenominal) concept, known as the intersection life cycle/ has been studied in a wide part of organic lawal settings. However, there argon sufficient opposing theories to raise the doubts of people like N. K. Dhalla and S. Yuspeh, who argued in t hese same pages a few old age ago that businessmen should forget the ingathering life cycle concept. Irrespective of whether the merchandise life cycle pattern is a general rule or holds only for specific cases, it does provide a utilitarian and provocative framework for idea virtually the growth and development of a new product, a company, or an entire indus essay. One of the major(ip) shortcomings of this approach, however, is that it concentrates on the selling implieations of the life cycle pattern.In so doing, it implies that some another(prenominal) aspects of the business and labor environment ply in concert with the market life cycle. term much(prenominal) a view whitethorn help one to think back on the kinds of ehanges that occur in antithetic industries, an one-on-one company leave alone frequently find it alike simplistic for consumption in its strategic planning. In fact, the concept may even be mis leadershiping in strategic planning. In this article w e suggest that separating the product life cycle concept from a related but unequivocal phenomenon that we will call the dish out life I TJie Product Life Cycle and InternationaTrade. Louis T. Wells, r. , ed. ICambridge, Mass. HarvaiiJ University Press, 1D71I, im example. proviJcs evidence from a number of industries that argues for broad application of this concept, 2. N. K. Dhalla and S. Yuspirh, Forget the Priidutt Life Cycle CnniepU HBR I3nuary-February 197(1, p. 101. 134 Harvard Business Review January-February 1979 cycle facilitates the discretion of the strategic options available to a company, particularly with regard to its manufacturing function. The product-process matrixThe process life cycle has heen attracting change magnitude attention from husiness managers and researchers everywhere the past several years. Just as a product and market escape through and through a series of major stagecoachs, so does the merchandise process used in the constrain of that pr oduct. The process evolution typically hegins with a fluid processone that is highly flexible, hut non very cost efficientand proceeds toward increase standardization, mechanization, and automation. This evolution culminates in a systemic process that is very efficient hut much to a greater extent dandy intensive, nterrelated, and hence less flexible than the master copy fluid process. Using a product-process matrix, Exhibit I suggests one way in which the interaction of cardinal the product and the process life cycle stages sewer he fight downed. The rows of this matrix represent the major stages through whieh a proceeds process tends to pass in spill from the fluid form in the overtake row to the systemic form in the bottom row. The columns represent the product life cycle phases, going from the great variety associated with startup on the left field side to standardized commodity products on the rightfulness side.Diagonal beat A company or a husiness unit within a di versified company) can be characterized as occupying a particular region in the matrix, determined by the stage of the product life cycle and its prime(a) of wargon process for that product. Some simple examples may clarify this. usual of a company positioned in the upper left-hand comer is a commercial printer. In such(prenominal) a company, each patronage is unique and a jumbled flow or job obtain process is usually selected as being most effective in meeting those product requirements.In such a job shop, jobs arrive in different forms and require different tasks, and thus the equipment tends to be relatively general purpose. Also, that equipment is seldom used at ioo% capacity, the workers typically have a wide range of merchandise skills, and each joh takes much longer to go through the plant than the lahor hours required by that job. however down the diagonal in this matrix, the shaper of heavy equipment usually directs a production social system characterized as a d isconnected line flow process.Although the company may make a numher of products (a customer may even be able to order a somewhat customized unit), economies of scale in manufacturing usually lead such companies to offer several hasic models with a variety of options. This enables manufacturing to move from a job shop to a flow pattern in which batches of a minded(p) model proceed irregularly through a series of work stations, or possihly even a low mountain assembly line. Even however down the diagonal, for a product like automobiles or major home appliances, a company will generally choose to ake only a few models and use a relatively mechanized and connected production process, such as a moving assembly line. much(prenominal) a process matches the product life cycle requirements that the automobile companies must satisfy with the economies availahle from a standardized and automated process. Finally, down in the far rightfield comer of the matrix, one would find refinery tra ding operations, such as oil or sugar processing, where the product is a commodity and the process is continuous.Although such operations are highly telld, inflexible, and capital intensive, their disadvantages are much than bring out by the low variable cost arising from a high volume passing through a standardized process. In Exhibit 7, two boxs in the matrix are void of industries or exclusive companies. The upper right-hand comer eharacterizes a commodity product produced by a job-shop process that is scarcely not economical. Thus there are no companies or industries located in that sector. Similarly, the lower left-hand corner represents a one-of-a-kind product that is make by continuous or very specific processes.such(prenominal) processes are simply too inflexible for such unique product requirements. Off the diagonal The examples cited thus far have been the more familiar diagonal cases, in which a certain kind of product structure is matehed with its natural process structure. But a company may seek a position 3. For example, William ), Abernathy and Philip L. Townscnd, TechnoloRy, Pioductivity, and execute Changes, in Tachnaloicdl Forfcoitinj iind Social Cbange, Volume VII, No. 4, 1975, p. 79) Abcmathy and lames Ulierback, DyQ. mic Model of turn and Product Innovation, Omega, Volume HI, No. 6, 1975, p. 6i9i Abernathy and Uuerback, Innovation and the Evolution of Technology in the Firm, Harvard Business School Working P. iper HBS 7S-fiR, Revised unc 197. Process life cycles 135 Exhibit I Matching major stages of product and process life cycles Product structure Product life cycle stage I Low volume-low standardization, one of a kind nonuple products low volume Few major products higher volume IV High volume-high standardization. commodity productsProcess structure Process life cycle stage Jumbled flow (job shop) Commercial printer disoriented line Mow (batch) Heavy equipment Connected line flow (assembly line) Automobile assembly IV persi sting flow off the diagonal instead of right on it, to its rivalrous advantage. Rolls-Royce Ltd. still makes a particular(a) product line of motor cars using a process that is more like a job shop than an assembly line. A company that allows itself to drift from the diagonal without understanding the likely implications of such a shift is asking for trouhle.This is apparently the case with several companies in the factory housing industry that allowed their manufacturing operations to become too capital intensive and too de- 136 Harvard Business Review January-February 1979 pendent on stable, high-volume production in the wee 1970s. As one might expect, when a company moves too far away from the diagonal, it hecomes progressively dissimilar from its competitors. This may or may not, depending on its success in achieving focalisation and exploiting the advantages of its niche, make it more vulnerable to attack.Coordinating marketing and manufacturing may become more difficult as the two areas show increasingly different opportunities and pressures. Not infrequently, companies find that either inadvertently or by conscious choice they are at positions on the matrix very dissimilar from those of their competitors and must consider drastic alterative action. most small companies that enter a mature industry start off this way, of course, which provides one rendering of some(prenominal)(prenominal) the strengths and the weaknesses of their situation.One example of a companys matching its movements on these two dimensions with changes in its industry is that of Zenith wireless Corporation in the mid-1960s. Zenith had generally followed a strategy of maintaining a high distributor point of flexibleness in its manufacturing facilities for color television receivers. We would characterize this process structure at that time as being stage 2. When planning additional capacity for color TV manufacturing in 1966 during the height of the rapid growth in the mar ket), however.Zenith chose to expand production capacity in a way that represented a clear move down the process dimension, toward the matrix diagonal, by consolidating color TV assembly in two adult plants. One of these was in a relatively low-cost labor area in the United States. While Zenith continued to have facilities that were more flexible than those of other companies in the industry, this finale reflected corporate managements assessment of the collect to stay within range of the industry on tbe process dimension so that its excellent marketing strategy would not be constrained by inefficient manufacturing.It is interesting that seven years by and by Zenith made a similar decision to keep all of its production of color television chasses in the United States, rather than lose the flexibility and incur the costs of moving production to the Far East. This decision, in conjunction with others made in the past five years, is now being called into question. Using our termino logy. Zenith again finds itself too far above the diagonal, in comparison with its boastfully, primarily Japanese, competitors, most of whom have mechanized their production processes, positioned them in low-wage countries, and embarked on other costreduction programs.Incorporating this additional dimension into strategic planning encourages more creative thinking about arrangingal vience and warring advantage. It also can lead to more informed predictions about the changes that are likely to occur in a particular industry and to consideration of the strategies that might be followed in responding to such charges. Finally, it provides a natural way to involve manufacturing managers in the planning process so that they can relate their opportunities and decisions more effectively with marketing strategy and corporate goals.The experience of the late 1960s and other(a) 1970s suggests that major competitive advantages can accrue to companies that are able to integrate their manu facturing and marketing organization with a common strategy. Using the concept We will explore three issues that follow from the product-process life cycle 1) the concept of distinctive competence, 2) the management implications of selecting a particular product-process conclave, considering the competition, and 3) the organizing of different operating units so that they can specialize on discern portions of the total manufacturing task while still maintaining overall coordination.Distinctive competence nearly companies like to think of themselves as being particularly good relative to their competitors in certain areas, and they try to avoid competition in others. Their objective is to guard this distinctive competence against outside attacks or interior aimlessncss and to exploit it where possible. From time to time, unfortunately, management becomes preoccupied with marketing concerns and loses sight of the value of manufacturing abilities. When this happens, it thinks about strategy in terms only of the product and market dimension within a product life cycle context.In effect, management concentrates resources and planning efforts on a relatively narrow column of the matrix shown in Exhibit 1 on page r35. 4. See ManufacturingMissing Link in Corporate Stiatcgy, by Wickham Skinner, HBR May-June 1969, p. i6. Process life cycles 137 Exhibit II Expanded product-process matrix Product structure Product light-headed cycle stage III Low volume low standardization, one of a kind Process structure Process life cycle stage Multiple products low volume Few major products higher volume IVHigh volume-fiigh standardization. commodity products Key management tasks Flexibilityquality Fast reaction commitment plant, estimating capacity Estimating costs and delivery times Breaking bottlenecks Order tracing and expediting Systematizing diverse elements Developing standards and methods, progress Balancing process stages Managing large, specialized, and complex operations Meeling material requirements Running equipment at peak efficiency time expansion and technological change Raising required capitalJumbled flow (lobshop) Disconnected line flow (batch) Connected line flow (assembly line) IV Continuous flow Hone Dependabilitycost Flexibility-quality Dependability-cosi dominant competitive mode Custom design General purpose High margins Custom design Ouality control swear out High margins Standardized design Volume manufacturing Finished goods inventory Distribution Backup suppliers Vertical integrating Long runs Specialized equipment and processes Economies of scale Standardized materialThe advantage of the two-dimensional point of view is that it permits a company to be more precise about what its distinctive competence truly is and to concentrate its attentions on a restricted set of process decisions and alternatives, as well as a re- stricted set of marketing alternatives. Real center on is maintained only whe n the emphasis is on a single patch in the matrixa process focus as well as a product or market focus. As suggested by Wickham Skinner, narrowing the focus of the business units 138 Harvard Business Review January-February 1979 ctivities and the supporting manufacturing plants activities may greatly increase the chance of success for the organization/ Thinking about both process and product dimensions can affect the way a company defines its product. For example, we recently explored the case of a specialized manufacturer of printed circuit boards. Managements initial assessment of its position on the m. atrix was that it was producing a lowvolume, one-of-a-kind product using a highly connected assembly line process. (This would place it in the lower left comer of the matrix. On further reflection, however, management decided that while the company specialized in small production batches, the product it really was offering was a design capability for special purpose circuit boards. In a sense, then, it was flock producing designs rather than boards. Hence, the company was not far off the diagonal after all. This knowledge of the companys distinctive competence was helpful to management as it considered different projects and decisions, only some of which were supportive of the companys actual position on the matrix. Effects of positionAs a company undertakes different combinations of product and process, management problems change. It is the interaction betwixt these two that determines which tasks will be critical for a given company or industry. Along the process structure dimension, for example, the key competitive advantage of a jumbled flow operation is its flexibility to both product and volume changes. As one moves toward more standardized processes, the competitive emphasis generally shifts from flexibility and quality (measured in terms of product specialization) to reliability, predictability, and cost.A similar sequence of competitive emphases oc curs as a company moves on the product structure dimension. These movements in priorities are illustrated in Exhibit 11 For a given product structure, a company whose competitive emphasis is on quality or new product development would choose a much more flexible production operation than would a competitor who has the same product structure but who follows a cost-minimizing strategy. Alternatively, a company that chooses a given process structure reinforces the characteristics of that structure by adopting the corresponding product structure.The former approach 5. The Focused Factory, HBR May-June 1974, p. 113. 6. Robert H. Hayes and Roger W. Schmenner, How Should You Organize Manufacturing? HBR January-February iy78, p. 105. positions the company above the diagonal, while the latter positions it somewhere on it. A companys location on the matrix should take into account its traditional orientation. Many companies tend to be relatively aggressive along the dimensionproduct or pro cess-where they feel most competent and take the other dimension as given by the industry and environment.For example, a marketing-oriented company seeking to be responsive to the needs of a given market is more likely to emphasize flexibility and quality than tbe manufacturing-oriented company that seeks to mold the market to its cost or process leadership. An example of these two competitive approaches in the electric motor industry is provided by the contrast between Reliance Electric and Emerson Electric. Reliance, on the one hand, has apparently chosen production processes that place it above the diagonal for a given product and market, and the company emphasizes product customizing and performance.Emerson, on the other hand, tends to position itself below the diagonal and emphasizes cost reduction. As a result of this difference in emphasis, the legal age of Reliances products are in the upper left quadrant, while Emersons products tend to be in the lower right quadrant. Eve n where the two companies product lines overlap. Reliance is likely to use a more fluid process for that product, while Emerson is more likely to use a standardized process. Eaeh company has sought to develop a set of competitive skills in manufacturing and marketing that will make it more effective within its selected quadrants.Concentrating on the upper left versus the lower right quadrant has many additional implications for a company. The management that chooses to compete primarily in the upper left has to decide when to drop or abandon a product or market, while for the management choosing to compete in the lower right a major decision is when to eater the market. In the latter case, the company can instruct the market develop and does not have as much need for flexibility as do companies that position themselves in the upper left, since product and market changes typically occur less frequently during the later phases of the product life cycle.Such thinking about both produc t and process expertise is particularly useful in selecting the match of these two dimensions for a new product. Those familiar with the digital watch industry may recall that in the early 1970s Texas Instruments introduced a jewelry line digital watch. This product represented a matrix combination in the upper left-hand quadrant, as shown in Exhibit U. Unfortunately, this line Process life cycles 139 of watches was disappoint to Texas Instruments, in terms of both volume and profitability.Early in 1976, therefore, TI introduced a digital watch selling for $19. 95. With only one electronic module and a connected line flow production process, this watch represented a combination of product and process further down the diagonal and much more in keeping with TIs traditional strengths and emphases. Organizing operations If management considers the process structure dimension of organizational competence and strategy, it can usually focus its operating units much more effectively on the ir individual tasks.For example, many companies face the problem of how to organize production of spare part for their primary products. While increasing volume of the primary products may have caused the company to move down the diagonal, the follow-on demand for spare separate may require a combination of product and process structures more toward the upper left-hand corner of the matrix. There are many more items to be manufactured, each in smaller volume, and the appropriate process tends to be more flexible than may be the case for the primary product.To accomodate the specific requirements of spare parts production, a cohipany might develop a separate facility for them or simply separate their production within the same facility. Probably the least appropriate approach is to leave such production consistent from the production of the basic product, since this would require the plant to span too broad a range of both product and process, making it less efficient and less effe ctive for both categories of product. The choice of product and process structures will determine the kind of manufacturing problems that will be important for management.Some of the key tasks related to a particular process structure are indicated on the right side of Exhibit U. Recognizing the impact that the companys position on the matrix has on these important tasks will often suggest changes in various aspects of the policies and procedures the company uses in managing its manufacturing function, particularly in its manufacturing control system. Also, measures used to monitor and evaluate the companys manufacturing performance must reflect the matrix position selected if such measures are to be both useful and consistent with the corporate goals and strategy.Such a task-oriented analysis might help a company avoid the loss of control over manufacturing that often results when a standard set of control mechanisms is applied to all products and processes. It also suggests the ne ed for different types of management skills and managers, depending on the companys major manufacturing tasks and dominant competitive modes. While a fairly narrow focus may be required for success in any single product market, companies that are large enough can and do) effectively produce multiple products in multiple markets.These are often in different stages of the product life cycle. However, for such an operation to be successful, a company must separate and organize its manufacturing facilities to best meet the needs of each product and then develop sales volumes that are large enough to make those manufacturing units competitive. An example of separating a companys total manufacturing capability into specialized units is provided by the Lynchburg Foundry, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Mead Corporation. This foundry has five plants in Virginia.As Exhibit U shows, these plants represent different positions on the matrix. One plant is a job shop, making mostly one-of-akind products. Two plants use a decoupled batch process and make several major products. A fourth plant is a paced assembly line operation that makes only a few products, mainly for the automative market. The fifth plant is a highly automated pipe plant, making what is largely a commodity item. While the basic engine room is somewhat different in each plant, there are many similarities.However, the production layout, the manufacturing processes, and the control systems are very different. This company chose to design its plants so that each would meet the needs of a specific particle of the market in the most competitive manner. Its success would suggest that this has been an effective way to match manufacturing capabilities with market demand. Companies that specialize their operating units according to the needs of specific, narrowly defined patches on the matrix will often encounter problems in integrating those units into a coordinated whole.A recent article suggested that a compan y can be most successful by organizing its manufacturing function well-nigh either a product-market focus or a process focus. * That is, individual units will either manage themselves relatively autonomously, responding directly to the needs of the markets they serve, or they will be divided according to process stages (for example, fabrication, subassembly, and final assembly), all coordinated by a central staff. Companies in the major materials industriessteel companies and oil companies, for exampleprovide classic examples of process-organized manu- 140Harvard Business Review January-February 1979 facturing organizations. Most companies that broaden the span of their process through vertical integration tend to adopt such an organzation, at least initially. Then again, companies that adopt a product- or market-oriented organization in manufacturing tend to have a strong market orientation and are unwilling to accept the organizational rigidity and lengthened solvent time that us ually accompany centralized coordination. Most companies in the packaging industry provide examples of such product- and market-focused manufacturing organizations.Regional plants that serve geographical market areas are set up to reduce transportation costs and provide better response to market requirements. A number of companies that historically have organized themselves around products or markets have found that, as their products matured and as they have moved to become more vertically integrated, a conflict has arisen between their original productorganized manufacturing facilities and the needs of their process-oriented internal supply units.As the competitive emphasis has shifted toward cost, companies moving along the diagonal have tended to evolve from a product-oriented manufacturing organization to a process-oriented one. However, at some point, such companies often discover that their operations have hecome so complex with increased volume and increased stages of inhous e production that they defy centralized coordination and management must revert to a more product-oriented organization within a divisionalized structure. ct line with a manufacturing systema set of people, plants, equipment, technology, policies, and control proceduresthat will permit a relatively high degree of flexibility and a relatively low capital intensity? Or should it prefer a system that will permit lower cost production with a loss of some flexibility to change in products, production volumes, and equipment) and usually a higher degree of capital intensity? This choice will position the company above or below its competitors along the vertical dimension of our matrix.There are, of course, several dynamic aspects of corporate competitiveness where the concepts of matching the product life cycle with the process life cycle can be applied. In this article, however, we have dealt only with the more static aspects of selecting a position on the matrix. We will discuss in a for thcoming article how a companys position on the product-process matrix might change over time and the traps that it can giving up into if the implications of such moves are not carefully evaluated. Strategy implications We can now pull together a number of threads and summarize their implications for corporate strategy.Companies must make a series of interrelated marketing and manufacturing decisions. These choices must be continually reviewed and sometimes changed as the companys products and competitors evolve and mature. A company may choose a product or marketing strategy that gives it a broader or narrower product line than its hint competitors. Such a choice positions it to the left or right of its competitors, along the horizontal dimension of our matrix. Having made this decision, the company has a further choice to make Should it produce this prod-

Friday, May 17, 2019

Cultural Influences on Rite of Passage B

Cultural Influences on Rite of Passage Beliefs and Rituals Cultures throughout the beingness honor the passing from childhood into adulthood with special celebrations and rituals that coincide with religious or social traditions. terra firma civilizations pay homage to this observance of passage differently, ranging from jovial and lighthearted galas to the barbaric rituals frequently associated with remote African tribes. There are overly other sects of the population where their youth enter a transitional build that lasts from months or days, such as the Amish and the Aborigines.Their youth use this beat as a period of encyclopaedism to think and act as adults and for decision making about their future. Amish or plain people as they are also known migrated from Europe in search of religious rationalizedom. They were originally part of the Mennonite piety and follow worldly concerny of the same practices at once. They are governed by the unwritten rules known as the Ordnu ng. They bouncy by principles of simplicity, reject arrogance, em set humility and socialize sole(prenominal) within their confederacy and avoid other split of society as much as possible.Amish children only attend school until they complete 8th aim and higher education is discouraged or forbidden. At the age of sixteen, Amish teens are given the choice of fighting(a) in Rumspringa, a German term that translates into run around in English. During this time Amish adolescents are free to explore life among modern American society. It is believed that at this age that they suffer reached a maturity level where they can act responsibly as well as having the skills for making rational informed decisions.This time of reflection is for the youths to decide if they want to inhabit in modern society or pay back to the Amish community where they are baptized as adults and are expected to follow the church for the recumb of their lives without question. Wargny 2 Rumspringa is also a catalyst for Amish teens to socialize and meet prospective marriage partners. They congregate with other youngish hands and women of Amish faith, experiment with alcohol, drugs, premarital sex, automobiles, cell phones, and video games. (Welcome to Lancaster County)Studies of rumspringa have concluded that approximately 85% of teens willingly strike to Amish life and forfeit all conveniences of technology and English ways of life. The small percentage of those choosing to remain in modern society, do so with the understanding that they are shunned by all Amish people including their straightaway family. There is no further contact or connection to their past and must live the rest of their lives as though they were strangers or non-existent to everyone they ever knew.The Australian Aborigine tribes are believed to have migrated from Asia more than 20,000 years ago and are native to the barren outback land of Australia. In ancient aboriginal culture, the rite of passage into manho od started at age 12 with a series of ceremonies and rituals held over a track down of a few years. The Alkira Kiumi as it is called, started at age 12, and involved the son being repeatedly tossed into the product line and caught by their male relatives of the tribe. Next was the circumcision procedure, which took place by a fire ring.The chief of the tribe sit down on the male childs chest and cut the foreskin of the penis off with a snappy stone or knife. The boy was given a boomerang to bite on for the pain. After the circumcision, the boy was make to kneel close to the fire so that the smoke would rise up and purify the annoy and then the elders of the tribe fed the young man his severed foreskin to symbolize the devouring of boyhood. Wargny 3 Months after the initial circumcision, a fireside sub incision ceremony was held. A stick was inserted into the urethra to brace the knife as it cut from the urethra to the scrotum.The boy then rose and allowed his blood to drip int o the flames of the fire. The second circumcision made it necessary for the boy to thereafter assume a squatting position in order to urinate. Anthropologists mull over that this ritual was performed so that young males would better understand and sympathize with a females menstrual cycle. After the circumcisions came a ceremony in which a chisel was used to knock out the front tooth of the young man as it was believed it made him more physically attractive. The next step toward manhood was to serve as a test of his courage by having him walk barefoot across a bed of fire.The final kind of the rite of passage into manhood was known as a walkabout and is also noted as a time for dreaming hence the name Dreamtime. According to Aboriginal belief, all life as it is today is part of one vast unchanging network of relationships which can be traced to the Great Ancestors of the Dreamtime (Rose Marina) It involved young men leaving the safety of their childhood homes to roam about in the barren desert to live on their own for a period of up to 6 months. During the walkabout the teen boys were only permitted to rely only on nature and the spiritual guidance of their ancestors for their survival.As they roamed through the uncivilized land it was believed that if they followed the guidance of the spirits they would return to their tribes safely and would from then on be considered men. And if they succumbed to the deserts elements, then it was believed that they failed the test of manhood and died shamefully as a boy. Wargny 4 Due to contact with the modern world, the ancient rituals of the aborigine tribes have disappeared or have been replaced by more civil ceremonies that merely symbolize the original rite of passage practices for becoming a man.As validation for becoming an adult, Rumspringa and Alkira Kiumi differ vastly. Rumspringa offers the opportunity to live carefree and seductively in what the Amish refer to as The devils playground without reprisal upon th eir return. Alkira Kiumi was a painful and grueling experience that served to prove a boys loyalty and faith in his heritage. Despite the overwhelming differences in these rites of passage, the completion of either of these ritualistic practices indicates a true allegiance to their respective religions and as paying homage to their ancestry.

College Is Exensive Essay

With a college degree being as needed as it is, it is implausibly expensive to get one. Studies show that many juicy shoal graduates that do realise college, cling that following grade fiddleing the colleges plenty of money. After doing some math, the numbers suggest that in oecumenical most colleges are bringing in plenty of extra money with an average 5. 3 one million million million dollars of profit. This is something that majorly hurts students financially who are just trying to get a college degree, which will be in minute used to essentially get themselves a well-paying career so they can pay back what they played out toget their college degree in the first place.Living in todays society, graduating from gamy school is simply not enough. Many employers will no longer look for just a high school diploma when considering hiring somebody, solely they instead look for a college degree. A college education is almost as necessary for todays youth as having a place to live , especially because its incredibly difficult for many people to afford a home without the financial stability that comes with a transaction provided by a college education. Our society is extremely dependent on collegesbut, are we in some delegacy harming ourselves by sacrificing huge portions of our annual income to these institutions? Colleges may be too expensive to call for every high school graduate in the United States looking one. In a study by the U. S. business office of Labor Statistics, it was found that 66 percent, or two of every three high school graduates attend college right out of high school (College, 2014). We estimate that for the 2013-2014 school year in that respect will be 3. 3 million high school graduates (What, n. d. ) , and we know that about.2,178,000 or two-thirds of the graduates will go on to attend college right away. Now taking an average cost of college at about $20,000 (Whats, n. d. ), we find that colleges across the U. S. bring in around an estimated total of $44,425,000,000 per year. Thats 44. 4 billion dollars towards U. S. colleges every year from the students alone. When we consider that there is a rough 6,700 colleges in the U. S. , it can be reasoned that, if every college received the same step of money, the average income per college per year would be about $6,600,000.Now consider the fact that an average college can be keptrunning on around $1,300,000 (Agron, 2009) (this price varies between colleges, given a more esteemed college will use more money to pay for better teachers and academic opportunities). This means that on average, colleges come on an annual profit of around $5,300,000 per year. College is extremely expensive, and the amount of money that they seem to keep each year is far too much. We dont just pay only for our education when we pay for college, but also to the board members most likely using the extra money brought in for comfort, providing a nicer life-style for themselves.While I do understand that collegesneed to bring in large amounts of money to collar in the black, I do not support the need to charge the incredibly costly amounts that they do. References Agron, J. (2009, April 1). thirty-eighth Annual Maintenance & Operations Cost Study for Colleges. Retrieved March 10, 2015, from http//asumag. com/Maintenance/university-maintenance- operations-cost-study- 200904? page=15 College readjustment and Work Activity of 2013 High school day Graduates. (2014, April 22). Retrieved March 10, 2015, from http//www. bls. gov/news. release/hsgec. nr0. htm What are the new Back to School statistics for 2014? (n. d. ).Retrieved March 10, 2015, from http//nces. ed. gov/fastfacts/display. asp? id=372 Whats the Price Tag for a College Education? (n. d. ). Retrieved March 10, 2015, from https//www. collegedata. com/cs/ cloy/content_payarticle_tmpl. jhtml? articleId 10064.